• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
The Science of Sport

The Science of Sport

Scientific comment and analysis of sports and sporting performance

  • About
    • Who are we?
    • Mission
    • Contact us
    • Archive
    • Sitemap
  • Running
    • African running
    • Event analysis
      • Marathons
        • Berlin Marathon
        • Boston Marathon
        • Chicago Marathon
        • Comrades Marathon
        • London Marathon
        • New York Marathon
      • Track and Field
        • Olympic Games
        • World Athletics Championships
    • Running Physiology
      • Barefoot running
      • Running technique
      • Running shoes
  • Cycling
    • Cycling Physiology
    • Doping in Cycling
    • Tour de France Analysis
      • 2016 Tour de France
      • 2015 Tour de France
      • 2014 Tour de France
      • 2013 Tour de France
      • 2012 Tour de France
      • 2011 Tour de France
      • 2010 Tour de France
      • 2009 Tour de France
      • 2008 Tour de France
      • 2007 Tour de France
  • Sports Science
    • Doping
    • Fatigue/Central Governor
    • Fluid, heat & thermoregulation
    • Physiology
    • Sudden Cardiac Death
    • Talent vs training
    • Training theories
    • Weight loss
  • Series
  • Sports management
    • Marketing & sponsorship
    • High performance management
  • News/Controversies
  • Other sports
    • Cricket
    • Football/Soccer
    • Rugby
    • Tennis
    • US sports
  • Research
    • Publications
    • Ross’ research
    • Jonathan’s research
  • PRESS
  • Book Ross
    • Testimonials
    • Speaking
    • Consulting
  • Show Search
Hide Search
You are here: Home / Cycling / Cycling Physiology / Evidence that the Biological Passport is effective, summary version

Evidence that the Biological Passport is effective, summary version

Ross Tucker · 21 Mar 2011 ·

Last updated on October 26th, 2013 at 04:02 pm

Estimated reading time: 2 minutes

The Biological Passport system has been criticized for being ineffective in the fight against doping. However, this is only when judged according to how many cyclists it has actually caught. That is only part of the question – the real test is whether it is effective enough to alter doping behaviour, possibly WITHOUT actually producing a slew of positive tests. And the answer to this question is a definite “yes”.

The graph below provides some evidence that this is the case. The results are explained briefly beneath the graph.

Percentage of blood samples measured in professional cycling that had UNUSUAL reticulocyte percentages. Source: Zorzoli & Rossi, 2010
Percentage of blood samples measured in professional cycling that had UNUSUAL reticulocyte percentages. Source: Zorzoli & Rossi, 2010

The graph shows the percentage of blood samples measured in professional cycling that had UNUSUAL reticulocyte percentages. Bear in mind that:

  • A ‘normal’ or physiological range for reticulocyte percent is 0.5% to 1.5%. Anything outside these is suggestive of doping
  • A HIGH reticulocyte percentage indicates that there are more immature RBC, and this happens because of removal of blood or the use of EPO, which both stimulate RBC formation
  • A LOW reticulocyte percentage indicates that there are fewer immature red blood cells because red blood cell production has been switched off – this happens after the infusion of RBC, or blood doping

Clearly, the introduction of the EPO test (red line) and the Biological Passport (blue line) change the balance of reticulocytes. First, EPO testing shifted abnormalities from high reticulocyte % to low reticulocyte % (suggesting a shift from EPO use to blood doping), and now the Biological Passport has reduced the overall percentage of abnormal samples dramatically.

There is no doubt that doping still occurs, but what this result suggests is that the ABP has been effective at bringing down the overall level of blood doping and EPO use. It has changed behaviour. The end result is a more even playing field, giving non-doped cyclists more of a chance.

For more on this, including a link between the above physiological changes suggesting less doping and performances in the Tour de France, read the related articles, below.

Ross

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • More
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Cycling Physiology, Doping in Cycling

Copyright © 2025 · Science of Sports · Log in

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.

    %d