• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
The Science of Sport

The Science of Sport

Scientific comment and analysis of sports and sporting performance

  • About
    • Who are we?
    • Mission
    • Contact us
    • Archive
    • Sitemap
  • Running
    • African running
    • Event analysis
      • Marathons
        • Berlin Marathon
        • Boston Marathon
        • Chicago Marathon
        • Comrades Marathon
        • London Marathon
        • New York Marathon
      • Track and Field
        • Olympic Games
        • World Athletics Championships
    • Running Physiology
      • Barefoot running
      • Running technique
      • Running shoes
  • Cycling
    • Cycling Physiology
    • Doping in Cycling
    • Tour de France Analysis
      • 2016 Tour de France
      • 2015 Tour de France
      • 2014 Tour de France
      • 2013 Tour de France
      • 2012 Tour de France
      • 2011 Tour de France
      • 2010 Tour de France
      • 2009 Tour de France
      • 2008 Tour de France
      • 2007 Tour de France
  • Sports Science
    • Doping
    • Fatigue/Central Governor
    • Fluid, heat & thermoregulation
    • Physiology
    • Sudden Cardiac Death
    • Talent vs training
    • Training theories
    • Weight loss
  • Series
  • Sports management
    • Marketing & sponsorship
    • High performance management
  • News/Controversies
  • Other sports
    • Cricket
    • Football/Soccer
    • Rugby
    • Tennis
    • US sports
  • Research
    • Publications
    • Ross’ research
    • Jonathan’s research
  • PRESS
  • Book Ross
    • Testimonials
    • Speaking
    • Consulting
  • Show Search
Hide Search
You are here: Home / Archives for Running / Running Physiology / Barefoot running

Barefoot running

A short thought on sport: Evaluating Eliud. Is Kipchoge a next-gen 2:02 marathoner, or a mid-2:04 runner in a technologically superior shoe? Who knows?

Ross · 01 May 2019 ·

Eliud Kipchoge is a physiological marvel. The Nike Vaporfly is a technological marvel. Both improve marathon performance. Except these statements can’t both be true, and the implications for the integrity of running and how we evaluate performances, can’t be ignored. This is an article on why that is.

2016 publications: From the armchair to the site, via these journals

Ross · 18 Oct 2016 ·

Much of what you read here on this site is my attempt to translate the research I’m interested in, and which can be applied to the real world, in a way that makes it more “palatable” to you. This post, however, summarizes some of the “source” research, the scientific articles that I’ve had published in the last 12 months, for those wanting to see the academic side of the discussions we have.

The Vibram lawsuit, barefoot running and science perspectives

Ross · 15 May 2014 ·

Vibram Five Finger shoes were last week ordered to pay $3.75 million in a class action lawsuit settlement. What it means for the barefoot running movement, and some scientific insights

A minimalism/ barefoot fad and inconsequential footstrikes?

Ross · 16 May 2013 ·

Was the barefoot and minimalist running ‘explosion’ just a fad? Recent stats from the shoe industry suggest a decline. Here’s why it’s more likely a “sustainable niche”, along with more caution on extremism and advocacy.

The low-carb, high fat diet debate and deviant thinking

Ross · 17 Feb 2013 ·

Deviant thinking is a crucial driver of progress, but there’s a point where it becomes extreme and unnecessarily polarizing. Balance and complexity are good…

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to Next Page »

Copyright © 2023 · Science of Sports · Log in